TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stockton v. Halstead

Stockton v. Halstead, 100 N.E. 82 (Ind. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 17, 1912
Docket
No. 22,215
Judges
Cox
Citations
100 N.E. 82179 Ind. 7011912 Ind. LEXIS 159
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Summary
From Jasper Circuit Court; E. B. Sellers, Special Judge. Proceedings instituted before the Board of Commissioners of Jasper County by Everett Halstead and others for the improvement of a certain highway, against which Almira M. Stockton and others remonstrated. From a judgment of the circuit court against the remonstrants, this appeal is prosecuted.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cox

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cox, J.

The questions presented by the record in this case are in all respects the same as those involved in the case of Stockton v. Yeoman (1913), ante 61, 100 N. E. 2 , and upon the authority of that case the appeal in this is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Moody v. Irwin104 N.E. 10 (Ind. 1914)

Most recent

  1. Moody v. Irwin104 N.E. 10 (Ind. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Stockton v. Yeoman, 100 N.E. 2 (Ind. 1912) 25

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list