TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schlosser v. Schlosser

Schlosser v. Schlosser, 110 N.E. 66 (Ind. 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 2, 1915
Docket
No. 22,938
Judges
Cox
Citations
110 N.E. 66183 Ind. 6591915 Ind. LEXIS 116
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Ar-BEAt.— Questions RevieioaWe.— Briefs.— Where the error assigned is the ruling on the demurrer to appellant’s complaint, appellant’s brief, which neither contains the complaint or its substance, nor states any point and authority in support thereof, is insufficient to invoke consideration of the error assigned.
Summary
From Warren Circuit Court; James T. Saunderson, Judge. Action by William Schlosser against Irene Schlosser and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)'

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cox

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cox, J.

Appellant filed his complaint in the lower court to quiet title to certain real estate. Appellees who were made defendants demurred to the complaint and their demurrer was sustained. Appellant refused to plead further and Suffered judgment that he take nothing by his complaint. From this judgment he has appealed and assigned as error the court’s ruling on demurrer.

The brief for appellant does not set out the complaint or the substance of it, nor the demurrer thereto. Nor is any proposition or point with authorities in support thereof stated. For this reason the brief is not sufficient to invoke jonsideration by this court of the error assigned. Clause 5, Rule 22. Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Réported in 110 N. E. 66 . See, also, 3 O. J. 1415, 1431; 2 Oye. 1013, 1014,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 11918: 219152026peak 1918 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Chastain v. Board of Commissioners119 N.E. 1007 (Ind. Ct. App. 1918)
  2. Shay v. Goins119 N.E. 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 1918)
  3. Kingan & Co. v. Clements110 N.E. 66 (Ind. 1915)

Most recent

  1. Chastain v. Board of Commissioners119 N.E. 1007 (Ind. Ct. App. 1918)
  2. Shay v. Goins119 N.E. 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 1918)
  3. Kingan & Co. v. Clements110 N.E. 66 (Ind. 1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Kingan & Co. v. Clements, 110 N.E. 66 (Ind. 1915) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list