Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gallivan
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company v. Gallivan
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Spencer, J.
— The issues presented by this appeal are identical with those which were considered in Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Miller (1918), 187 Ind. 684 , 119 N. E. 801 , and, on the authority of that decision, we hold in this case that the trial court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellant’s fifth paragraph of answer.
Judgment reversed, with instructions to overrule the demurrer to said fifth paragraph of answer and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.