TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Wilkerson v. East

State of Indiana on Relation of Wilkerson v. East, Judge of Monroe Circuit Court

State ex rel. Wilkerson v. East, 122 N.E.2d 733 (Ind. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 29, 1954
Docket
No. 0-390
Judges
Draper
Citations
122 N.E.2d 733233 Ind. 6571954 Ind. LEXIS 257

Opinion of the Court — Draper

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Draper, J.

The relator has filed an original action in this court whereby he seeks an alternative writ of mandate against the respondent, Judge of the Monroe Circuit Court.

*658

*657 The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, and Rule 2-85 of this court requires that in such cases “certified copies of all pleadings, orders *658 and entries pertaining to the subject matter should be set out in the petition or made exhibits thereto.” Compliance with this rule is necessary if this court is to be sufficiently advised so as to decide the issues presented.

The certified copies which the relator has supplied with his petition are not sufficient to comply with the rule, and are wholly insufficient to enable this court to determine whether or not an alternative writ should issue.

Neither does the petitioner allege service of a copy of his pleading in the Monroe Circuit Court upon the Attorney General of the State of Indiana as required by §49-1937, Burns’ 1951 Replacement. See State ex rel. Buchanan v. Gerdink (1947), 225 Ind. 473 , 75 N. E. 2d 899 ; State ex rel. Minton v. Parke Cir. Ct. (1947), 226 Ind. 55 , 77 N. E. 2d 749 ; Becker v. Stanley (1950), 228 Ind. 429 , 92 N. E. 2d 851 ; State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall (1952), 231 Ind. 70 , 106 N. E. 2d 796 .

Neither has the trial court, as distinguished from the judge of that court, been made a party to this proceeding. See Selke v. State (1937), 211 Ind. 232 , 6 N. E. 2d 570 .

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 122 N. E. 2d 733 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 21962: 119612026peak 1961 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall, 106 N.E.2d 796 (Ind. 1952) 9
Selke v. State, 6 N.E.2d 570 (Ind. 1937) 4
State ex rel. Buchanan v. Gerdink, 75 N.E.2d 899 (Ind. 1947) 3
Becker v. Stanley, 92 N.E.2d 851 (Ind. 1950) 2
State ex rel. Minton v. Parke Circuit Court, 77 N.E.2d 740 (Ind. 1948) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list