TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Daubenspeck v. City of Ligonier

Daubenspeck v. City of Ligonier, 191 N.E.2d 100 (Ind. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 11, 1962
Docket
No. 19,434
Judges
Jackson
Citations
191 N.E.2d 100245 Ind. 201962 Ind. LEXIS 197

Opinion of the Court — Jackson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition To Transfer Jackson, J.

— The petition to transfer is denied. By denying transfer herein we do not thereby approve of all the language of the Appellate Court opinion.

Arterburn, Landis and Achor, JJ., concur. Myers, C. J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 191 N. E. 2d 100 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11963: 21964: 11965: 11974: 11982: 119622026peak 1963 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Economy Oil Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue321 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. Ct. App. 1974)
  2. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Osco Drug, Inc.431 N.E.2d 823 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982)
  3. Fair Share Organization v. Mitnick198 N.E.2d 765 (Ind. 1964)
  4. Annexation to City of Mishawaka v. Minne212 N.E.2d 393 (Ind. Ct. App. 1965)
  5. Daubenspeck v. City of Ligonier183 N.E.2d 95 (Ind. Ct. App. 1962)
  6. Fair Share Organization, Inc. v. Mitnick188 N.E.2d 840 (Ind. Ct. App. 1963)

Most recent

  1. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Osco Drug, Inc.431 N.E.2d 823 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982)
  2. Economy Oil Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue321 N.E.2d 215 (Ind. Ct. App. 1974)
  3. Annexation to City of Mishawaka v. Minne212 N.E.2d 393 (Ind. Ct. App. 1965)
  4. Fair Share Organization v. Mitnick198 N.E.2d 765 (Ind. 1964)
  5. Fair Share Organization, Inc. v. Mitnick188 N.E.2d 840 (Ind. Ct. App. 1963)
  6. Fair Share Organization, Inc. v. Mitnick191 N.E.2d 317 (Ind. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list