TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fechtman v. Stover

Fechtman v. Stover, 217 N.E.2d 587 (Ind. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 22, 1966
Docket
No. 19,508
Judges
Arterburn
Citations
217 N.E.2d 587247 Ind. 4981966 Ind. LEXIS 387

Concurrence — Arterburn

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Concurring Opinion Arterburn, J.

I concur in the denial of the petition to transfer, but I do so upon the ground that I do not think that instructions numbers 22 and 25 given by the trial court are pertinent, for the reason that the statute referred to is not applicable, since the Act refers merely to buildings, and in my opinion does not cover concrete steps on a walkway, *499 eight to ten feet from the building, when reference is made in the Act to “stairway and stairways.”

Note. — Reported in 217 N. E. 2d 587 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 219722026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cheaney v. State285 N.E.2d 265 (Ind. 1972)
  2. Roeschlein v. Thomas280 N.E.2d 581 (Ind. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Cheaney v. State285 N.E.2d 265 (Ind. 1972)
  2. Roeschlein v. Thomas280 N.E.2d 581 (Ind. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list