TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jean E. Brytus, John Lazor, Wheat Giacobbe, John Stanko Steve Kotyk, Alex Warcholak, John Kotyk, Sam Borielle, Jr. v. Spang & Company, Union National Bank, Pension Plan, for Former Bargaining Unit Employees of Fort Pitt Bridge and Electric Weld Divisions at Canonsburg, Pa, Plant (2 Cases) Edward J

Jean E. Brytus, John Lazor, Wheat Giacobbe, John Stanko Steve Kotyk, Alex Warcholak, John Kotyk, Sam Borielle, Jr. v. Spang & Company, Union National Bank, Pension Plan, for Former Bargaining Unit Employees of Fort Pitt Bridge and Electric Weld Divisions at Canonsburg, Pa, Plant (2 Cases) Edward J. Golonka v. Spang & Company, Pension Plan for Former Bargaining Unit Employees Fort Pitt Bridge Electric Weld Division at Canonsburg, Pa, Plant (2 Cases)

Brytus v. Spang & Co., Union Nat'l Bank, Pension Plan, for Former Bargaining Unit Employees of Fort Pitt Bridge & Elec. Weld Divisions at Canonsburg, Pa, Plant (2 Cases) Edward J, 79 F.3d 1137 (3d Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 7, 1996
Docket
No. 95-3218
Citations
79 F.3d 1137

Opinion

79 F.3d 1137

Jean E. Brytus, John Lazor, Wheat Giacobbe, John Stanko Steve Kotyk, Alex Warcholak, John Kotyk, Sam Borielle, Jr. v. Spang & Company, Union National Bank, Pension Plan, for Former Bargaining Unit Employees of Fort Pitt Bridge and Electric Weld Divisions at Canonsburg, PA, Plant (2 Cases); Edward J. Golonka v. Spang & Company, Pension Plan for Former Bargaining Unit Employees Fort Pitt Bridge Electric Weld Division at Canonsburg, PA, Plant (2 Cases)

NOS. 95-3218, 95-3248

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Feb 07, 1996

Appeal From: W.D.Pa., Nos. 88-cv-02548, 91-cv-01041,

Lee, J.

1

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2000: 220002026peak 2000 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list