Campbell v. Horner
Campbell, Administrator v. Horner
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gavin, J. —
This is an appeal from an allowance by the court of a claim against the estate represented by appellant. Judgment was entered March 24, 1893, and motion for new trial overruled May 6, 1893. The transcript was not filed until December 30, 1893. No application or order for an extension of time in which to appeal has ever been made.
Under section 2610, R. S. 1894 (section 2455, R. S. 1881), thirty days are allowed in such cases within which to file the transcript in the Supreme Court. Simons v. Simons, 129 Ind. 248 .
The transcript not having been filed within this time, the appeal is not well taken, and the motion to dismiss must be sustained. Yearley, Admr., v. Sharp, Admr., 96 Ind. 469 ; Browning v. McCracken, 97 Ind. 279 ; Miller, Admr., v. Carmichael, 98 Ind. 236 ; Rinehart v. Vail, Admr., 103 Ind. 159 .
Counsel suggest that the time for appeal might have been extended by order of this court, and that we should therefore regard it as having been done. It is sufficient *87 answer to this to say that if appellant desired such a favor it should have been asked for, seasonably, proper notice given and a sufficient showing made. Rinehart v. Vail, supra.
Filed Feb. 7, 1895.
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.