State ex rel. Whistler v. Herod
The State, ex rel. Whistler, Guardian v. Herod
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Black, J.
The question earnestly argued by counsel is not properly before us. The rulings of the court sustaining demurrers of the appellees to the complaint of the appellant are assigned as errors. In the transcript of the record filed in this court such rulings, with the exceptions thereto of the appellant, are shown, but no further proceedings are set forth in the transcript. What final judgment, if any, was rendered does not appear. Sustaining a demurrer to a complaint is not a final judgment, and from such ruling alone, without the further action of the court, an appeal will not lie. Brannock v. Stocker, 76 Ind. 573 ; Slagle v. Bodmer, 58 Ind. 465 ; Thomas v. Chicago, etc., R. Co., 139 Ind. 462 ; Gray v. Singer, 137 Ind. 257 ; Champ v. Kendrick, 130 Ind. 545 ; City of Jeffersonville v. Tomlin, 7 Ind. App. 681 ; Masten v. Indiana, etc., Co., 19 Ind. App. 633 ; Foster v. Lindley, 20 Ind. App. 155 .
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.