Mills v. Cowgill
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Shea, P. J.
This was an action in assumpit by appellants for the balance of deposits made by them in the Bank of North Manchester, a copartnership, of which appellees are the only living members within service of the court. Every question properly presented by the briefs in this case is decided adversely to appellants’ contention in the ease of Hornaday v. Cowgill (1913), 54 Ind. App. 631 , 101 N. E. 1030 . On the authority of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.