Gray v. Wiscaver
Gray v. Wiscaver, 124 N.E. 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 1919)
Headnotes
Appeal. — Evidence Conflicting. — Review.-—Where the only questions presented under the rules of the Appellate Court require for determination a review of conflicting evidence, the judgment of the trial court is conclusive and will be affirmed.
Summary
From Pike Circuit Court; John L. Brets, Judge.
Action between Tillman D. Gray and George Wis-caver and another. From the judgment rendered, Tillman D. Gray appeals.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Remy, J.
— The only questions which under the rules of this court are presented for our consideration require-for their determination a review of conflicting evidence. Under such circumstances the judgment of the trial court is conclusive, and on the authority of Gass v. Coggswell (1873), 44 Ind. 355 , and Nicholson v. Smith (1916), 60 Ind. App. 385 , 110 N. E. 1007 , the judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.