TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz

Republic Iron and Steel Company v. Markiowicz

Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz, 129 N.E. 710 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 4, 1921
Docket
No. 10,915
Judges
Nichols
Citations
129 N.E. 71075 Ind. App. 571921 Ind. App. LEXIS 243
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Master and Servant. — Workmen’s Compensation Act. — Injury Contributing to Hasten Latent Disease. — Right to Compensation. —Where there was ample evidence to show that a servant’s injuries resulted in a weakened vitality and resistance, and that latent tuberculosis was aggravated and accelerated into active tuberculosis from which he died, compensation was properly awarded his dependents under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1915 p. 392, §80201 et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918).
Summary
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Emilia Markiowicz and others against the Republic Iron and Steel Company. From an award for applicants, the defendant appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Nichols

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Nichols, J.

Appellees are dependents of Mike Markiowicz, deceased. The Industrial Board found that the deceased was in the employment of appellant on February 18, 1918, at a weekly wage of $24, and that on said date he received personal injury by accident arising out of and in due course of his employment, as a result of which he died December 28, 1918. There was an award accordingly for appellees. Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the finding and award, while appellees contend that the evidence is sufficient. The deceased was injured by an explosion which enveloped him with steam and gas, and struck him with debris, injuring his head, his hip and side. He was confined to his bed for a month, and received compensation for total disability for fifty-seven days. He was apparently a healthy man up to the time of his injury, but appellees’ physician testified that there was evidence of chronic disease, and the examination, his cough, and the history showed tuberculosis of the lungs. He was never well after the accident. The physician testified that the history would indicate that his trouble was the result of his injury. There was ample evidence that the injury resulted in a weakened vitality and resistance, and that latent tuberculosis was aggravated and accelerated into active tuberculosis from which he died. Without going further into the evidence, we hold *59 that it was sufficient to sustain the finding and award. In re Bowers (1917), 65 Ind. App. 128 , 116 N. E. 842 ; Sallie Robinson v. National Life, etc., Ins. Co. (1921), (Ind. App.) 129 N. E. 707 . The award is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1922: 11923: 11928: 11930: 11933: 11934: 11935: 21940: 11945: 119222026peak 1935 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Magazine v. Shull60 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. Ct. App. 1945)
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maddox183 S.E. 570 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
  3. State v. Gageby184 N.E. 190 (Ind. Ct. App. 1933)
  4. Calumet Foundry & Machine Co. v. Mroz141 N.E. 883 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923) · Dissent
  5. Majestic Co. v. Kreig161 N.E. 927 (Ind. Ct. App. 1928)
  6. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.41 P.2d 605 (Idaho 1934)

Most recent

  1. Magazine v. Shull60 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. Ct. App. 1945)
  2. Young v. Herrington99 P.2d 441 (Idaho 1940)
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maddox183 S.E. 570 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
  4. Turner v. State Industrial Commission1935 OK 963, 50 P.2d 668
  5. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.41 P.2d 605 (Idaho 1934)
  6. State v. Gageby184 N.E. 190 (Ind. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re Bowers, 116 N.E. 842 (Ind. Ct. App. 1917) 37
Robinson v. Nat'l Life & Accident Ins., 129 N.E. 707 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list