TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Salinger v. Rupel

Salinger v. Rupel, 135 N.E. 179 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 18, 1922
Docket
No. 11,088
Judges
McMahan
Citations
135 N.E. 17978 Ind. App. 1971922 Ind. App. LEXIS 93

Opinion of the Court — McMahan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McMahan, J.

— Appellant appeals from a decree foreclosing a mechanic’s lien, and in support of his assignment of errors and brief in support thereof has made a prima facie showing of reversible errors. Appellee has filed no brief and under the circumstances we will treat such failure as a confession of errors.

The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 11930: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland City171 N.E. 378 (Ind. 1930)
  2. Remington v. Edwards138 N.E. 824 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland City171 N.E. 378 (Ind. 1930)
  2. Remington v. Edwards138 N.E. 824 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list