TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morse v. Close

Morse v. Close, 11 Iowa 93 (1860)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 6, 1860
Judges
Baldwin
Citations
11 Iowa 93
Headnotes
1. Practice ; exceptions. The Supreme Court will not review rulings of tlie District Court in refusing to give instructions when no exceptions were properly taken to such rulings at the time they were taken. 2. Same : misjoinder of parties. Objections to the joinder of parties ■ should bo taken by the defendants in the pleadings. Such objections will not be considered when presented for the first time in the Supreme Court.
Summary
Appeal from Buchanan District Court. The material facts are sufficiently presented in the opinion of the Court. I. When one of the joint makers of a promissory note is discharged, it operates as a discharge of all. Story Prom, Notes, section 402, 428,425 and 435; 1 Story Eq. Jur. 112. II. A judgment on a joint promissory note against one of the makers operates as a merger of the note, Dow v. Bother, 12 111. 373; Story Prom. Notes section 407; Pindall v. Malicio, 1 Scam. 138 and 562; 6 Blackf. 101; 18 John. 45§ ; 2 Scam. 89 and 571; Wright et al. v. Meridiih, 4 lb. 361; Wright et al. v. Hoffman lb. 362. contended: 1. That the common law as to the effect of a separate judgment against one of two or more joint debtors has been changed by the Code of 1859, Section 1816: 2. That a person acting en autre droit is of a different nature from a judgment against a person sue juris. 6 Iowa 247; 1 Parsons Cont. 31; 3. That when the persons are jointly indebted, the death of one severs the joinder; Bac. Abr. Title “Obligations” D 4; 2 Mass. 572. . •

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Baldwin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Baldwin, J.

This was an action to recover upon a joint promissory note given by Frank Hastings, in his life time, and Thomas W. Close, the appellant. Hastings having died before the commencement of this suit his administrators are *95 made defendants with Close the appellant. Judgment by default was taken against the administrators, and upon issue joined and trial, against Close.

The first assignment of error is, that the court below refused to give certain instructions asked by defendant. It does not appear that any exceptions were taken by the appellant to the ruling of the court below. Unless such ruling was excepted to at the time and made part of the record by bill of exceptions, it will not be considered by this court. 1 Iowa 226 and 205; 2 Ib. 447.

It is also insisted that the court erred in rendering a judgment against appellant after judgment had been rendered against said administrators. The record shows that the judgment was rendered against all of the defendants at the same time. The judgment against the administrators by default, and against appellant upon the finding of the jury. No objections were made by appellant in his pleadings to a joinder of himself with the other defendants, and we think it too late to raise the question, for the first time, in this' Court.

It is further claimed that the court erred in rendering judgment against the administrators. They do not complain. Close alone appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Salter v. Freight Sales Co.357 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Salter v. Freight Sales Co.357 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Claussen v. La Franz, 1 Iowa 226 (1855) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list