TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Winton v. Sherman

Winton v. Sherman, 20 Iowa 295 (1866)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 18, 1866
Judges
Cole
Citations
20 Iowa 295
Headnotes
1. Tender; DEED: in action on bond. In an action at law to recover the consideration agreed to be paid for real estate not conveyed, but which by the contract of purchase was to be conveyed at the time of payment of the consideration, it is a sufficient defense that the deed had not been delivered or tendered: aliter, in a proceeding in equity to foreclose the bond as a mortgage.
Summary
Appeal from BlacJchawJc District Court. This action is brought upon a contract for the sale and purchase of certain lands in Blackhawk and Floyd counties. The contract is signed by both parties, and by it the plaintiff agrees to. sell and convey, by good and sufficient deed, to the defendant, the lands mentioned, at a time specified, if the defendant shall first make'the payment named; and the defendant agrees to buy the land, and to pay the sum stated at the time fixed. Time is made of the essence of the contract, with the right of forfeiture at the option of plaintiff, upon defendant’s default. The suit is in equity to'obtain judgment and foreclose defendant’s interest in the land. There' was an answer filed by the defendant containing several counts, and in the fifth couqt it was set up as a defense that the plaintiff had not tendered or delivered to defendant a deed for the land. To this count in the answer, the .plaintiff filed a demurrer, because it did not' state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of defense. The demurrer was overruled and plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cole

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cole, J.

i tender-action1?!! bond' In an action at law to recover the consideration agreed to be paid for real estate not yet conveyed, ^ut w^c^) by the contract of purchase, was to be conveyed at the' time of the payment of the consideration, it has been held a sufficient defense to aver and show that the deed had not .been delivered or tendered. See School Distriet No. 2 v. Rogers, 8 Iowa, 316 ; Berryhill v. Byington, 10 Iowa, 223 ; Leonard v. Bates, 1 Blackf., 172 .

*297 But this rule does not obtain in equity causes, where the court, upon a final decree, can grant just such relief as the plaintiff may show himself entitled to, upon such conditions as shall fully protect the right of the defendants, not only as to the subject matter, but also as to costs. A delivery or tender of a deed, before bringing suit in equity for the purchase-money and foreclosure of lien therefor, or other equitable relief, is not necessary. See Rutherford v. Haven & Co., 11 Iowa, 587 , and cases cited.

[Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1875–1876: 11877–1878: 11881–1882: 11887–1888: 31893–1894: 11913–1914: 11915–1916: 11923–1924: 21927–1928: 11931–1932: 11937–1938: 118752026peak 1887 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Braig v. Frye199 N.W. 977 (Iowa 1924)
  2. Bortz v. Wright214 N.W. 552 (Iowa 1927)
  3. Stevenson v. Polk32 N.W. 340 (Iowa 1887)
  4. Harrington v. Birdsall56 N.W. 961 (Neb. 1893)
  5. Wightman v. Spofford8 N.W. 680 (Iowa 1881)
  6. Iles v. Elledge18 Kan. 296 (1877)

Most recent

  1. Utterback v. Stewart277 N.W. 735 (Iowa 1938)
  2. Foft v. Page245 N.W. 312 (Iowa 1932)
  3. Bortz v. Wright214 N.W. 552 (Iowa 1927)
  4. Braig v. Frye199 N.W. 977 (Iowa 1924)
  5. Huie v. Falde197 Iowa 289 (1924)
  6. Dubois v. Andrews1915 OK 736, 152 P. 440

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Leonard v. Bates, 1 Blackf. 172 (1822) 23
Sch. Dist. No. Two v. Rogers, 8 Iowa 316 (1859) 10
Rutherford v. Haven, 11 Iowa 587 (1861) 9
Berryhill v. Byington, 10 Iowa 223 (1859) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list