State v. Hilton
State v. Hilton and Gordon
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lowe, Ch. J.
1. New trial insufficiency of evidence. The guilt or innocence of the defendant is a question in which the appeal lies to the testimony in the -cause. This was exclusively circumstantial. 13ut these circumstances, when closely examingd, strike us as rather too remote, light and inconclusive to establish defendant’s guilt or to justify the verdict rendered in the premises. And we cannot but feel, after a-careful consideration of the same, that the evidence is so lacking in affirmative force to generate a belief of probable guilt, that the issue between the State and the prisoner had better be re-submitted to the determination of a second jury. For this purpose we order a new trial and remand the cause.
Eeversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.