TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith v. Directors of the Ind. Sch. Dist.

Smith v. The Directors of The Ind. Sch. Dist. of Keokuk

Smith v. Directors of the Ind. Sch. Dist., 40 Iowa 518 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 11, 1875
Judges
Cole
Citations
40 Iowa 518
Headnotes
Schools: exclusion on account of colok. A pupil, otherwise eligible, cannot be excluded from the public schools of this state on account of his color, nor, if colored, can he be compelled to attend a separate school for colored children. Following Clark v. The Board of Directors, etc., 24 Iowa, 266.
Summary
Appeal from Lee Gireuii Qoxwt. This is a proceeding for mandamus. The plaintiff avers that he is a boy aged about sixteen years, is of African descent, a citizen of Keokuk, has attended the graded schools there for several years, has passed the examination requisite to entitle him to admission to the high school, and is of good moral character and otherwise entitled to admission there; that the defendants are directors of said school district, and refuse plaintiff admission thereto because of his descent and color. The defendants admit the age, residence, descent, examination, qualification, moral character and color of the plaintiff as stated, and also their refusal to admit him to the high school; but they deny that such refusal was because of plaintiff’s descent or color, and ayer that the high school room or building proper was full, and that they had provided for the instruction of the plaintiff and other colored children in all the high school studies and by a competent teacher, in another room or building within the district; that the citizens of the city and district are opposed to mixed schools, and to admit colored pupils with the white would destroy the harmony and impair the usefulness of the high school. The pleadings are very extended, covering near thirty pages of printed matter, but the foregoing comprehends the substance thereof. The cause was tried to the court, who found the facts and thereon rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and ordered a peremptory mandamus as prayed. The defendants appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cole

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Cole, J.

The Circuit Court found as a fact, upon the evidence, that the plaintiff was refused permission “ to attend the high school on account of his being a boy of African descent, and that if he had been a white boy he would have been permitted to attend said high school and enjoy its benefits.” This is the pivotal and the only controverted material fact in the case. The finding of the court, in view of the conflict in the evidence, is conclusive upon us, since the action is triable as an ordinary action, and the finding of the court, in such case, stands as the verdict of a jury. But, in any event, a careful re-reading of the pleadings and evidence has satisfied us that the finding by the court below is well sustained by the records^and evidence. This brings the case within the rule settled by this court in Clark v. The B’d of Directors, etc., 24 Iowa, 266 , which holds that a pupil may *520 not be excluded the schools because of his color, or required to attend a separate school for colored children. Following that case, the judgment in this is

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1875–1876: 11881–1882: 21903–1904: 21905–1906: 11917–1918: 118752026peak 1881 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Perkins v. Board of Directors of the Independent School District56 Iowa 476 (1881)
  2. Board of Education v. Tinnon ex rel. Tinnon26 Kan. 1 (1881)
  3. Preston v. Board of Education100 N.W. 54 (Iowa 1904)
  4. Lee v. Hoffman182 Iowa 1216 (1918)
  5. Weir v. State ex rel. Worl68 N.E. 1023 (Ind. 1903)
  6. Harley v. Lindemann109 N.W. 570 (Wis. 1906)

Most recent

  1. Lee v. Hoffman182 Iowa 1216 (1918)
  2. Harley v. Lindemann109 N.W. 570 (Wis. 1906)
  3. Preston v. Board of Education100 N.W. 54 (Iowa 1904)
  4. Weir v. State ex rel. Worl68 N.E. 1023 (Ind. 1903)
  5. Board of Education v. Tinnon ex rel. Tinnon26 Kan. 1 (1881)
  6. Perkins v. Board of Directors of the Independent School District56 Iowa 476 (1881)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Clark v. Bd. of Directors, 24 Iowa 266 (1868) 39

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list