TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lowenstein v. Monroe

Lowenstein v. Monroe and Foster

Lowenstein v. Monroe, 3 N.W. 51 (Iowa 1879)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 27, 1879
Judges
Seevers
Citations
3 N.W. 5152 Iowa 231
Headnotes
1. Pleading: verification: amendment. A defective verification of a petition in attachment may be amended under section 3021 of the Code.
Summary
Appeal from' Polh Oi/rcuit Oourt. A petition was filed, asking a writ of attachment. The verification, made by an attorney, was as follows: “the facts set forth in the foregoing petition as grounds for the attachment, and the same are within my own knowledge, and the same are true as I verily believe.” The intervenor, claiming the property attached by virtue of a general assignment made to him by the defendant, filed a motion t© quash the attachment, because the petition was not properly and sufficiently verified. Before this motion was submitted to the court the plaintiff, in pursuance of leave of the court, filed an amended petition, which, among other things, stated that “ the causes of attachment alleged in the original petition were true at the commencement of this action, and the filing of the original petition, and the issuing of the writ of attachment.” This petition was verified by the plaintiff. The intervenor filed another motion to quash the attachment on various grounds, which was overruled, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Seevers

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Seevers, J.

It is not claimed the petition verified by the plaintiff was not sufficiently verified, but the point made is that, as the original petition was verified only as to the sufficiency of the causes of attachment, the defect was one which could not be cured by amendment.

We think otherwise. The defect, under section 3021 of the Code, could be well cured, and it was properly done by the verified amended petition. Murdough v. McPherrin 49 Iowa, 479 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1880–1881: 11884–1885: 11910–1911: 218802026peak 1910 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Starkey v. Lunz110 P. 702 (Or. 1910)
  2. Hilbish v. Asada125 N.W. 556 (N.D. 1910)
  3. Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.47 Ark. 31 (1885)
  4. Magoon v. Gillett6 N.W. 131 (Iowa 1880)

Most recent

  1. Starkey v. Lunz110 P. 702 (Or. 1910)
  2. Hilbish v. Asada125 N.W. 556 (N.D. 1910)
  3. Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.47 Ark. 31 (1885)
  4. Magoon v. Gillett6 N.W. 131 (Iowa 1880)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Murdough v. McPherrin, 49 Iowa 479 (1878) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list