TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gregg v. White

Gregg v. White, 7 N.W. 404 (Iowa 1880)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 8, 1880
Judges
Rothrocic
Citations
7 N.W. 40455 Iowa 744
Headnotes
Practice in the supreme court.
Summary
Appeal from Adams Circuit Court. Tnis is a controversy as to the rights of the respective parties arising out of the construction and maintenance of a partnership ditch upon the line between the lands owned by the parties. The plaintiff constructed a ditch upon his own land which flowed into the partnership ditch, which defendant claimed’injured his land, and defendant entered upon plámtiff’s land and filled up said ditch and made an excavation in a dam erected by plaintiff. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace and damages in the sum of $100 were claimed. A trial was had before the justice of the peace, and an appeal was taken to the Circuit Court, where a trial by jury was had which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Rothrocic

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Rothrocic, J.

— This appeal must be dismissed. The amount in controversy as shown by the pleadings does not exceed one hundred dollars, and the certificate of the trial judge required by § 3173 of the Code and rule 12 of tiffs court is not sufficient to authorize us to take jurisdiction of the appeal. The certificate in substance states that there is a question of law involved in the 8th and 9bh instructions given by the court to the jury, and in *745 the 1st, 2d and 3d instructions asked by the plaintiff and refused by the court.

These .instructions involve more than one question of law. Winch of them it is desired shall be determined by this court the certificate does not point out. •

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list