TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Krumweide v. Schroeder

Krumweide v. Schroeder, 9 N.W. 107 (Iowa 1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 7, 1881
Judges
Adams
Citations
9 N.W. 10756 Iowa 160
Headnotes
1. Justice of the peace: jurisdiction: landlord and tenant. A justice of the peace has no jurisdiction to render a judgment of removal against a lessor to put his lessee in possession.
Summary
Appeal from Bremer District Court-. Action for an injunction to restrain the execution of a warrant of removal from premises alleged by plaintiffs to constitute their homestead. The injunction was granted, and afterwards a motion was made to dissolve the same, which motion was overruled. From the order overruling the motion the defendants appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Adams

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Adams, Ch. J.

The warrant or order of removal was granted by the defendant Stephenson as justice of the peace.

In the action in which the judgment was obtained upon which the order was issued, Sohroeder claimed that the plaint-tiff, Fred Krumweide, leased the premises to him and after-wards refused to give possession, at least so far as the dwelling house on the premises is concerned. Mrs. Krumweide, wife of Fred Krumweide, who is joined as plaintiff herein, was not a party to the lease or to the action in which the judgment of removal was obtained. We do not, however, deem this fact material, for it appears to us that the justice had no jurisdiction to render a judgment of removal even against her husband. It may have been suj>pdsed that the action was one for forcible entry or detention of real property, but it was not such action. The statute makes no provision *161 whereby a lessee can maintain such action against the lessor. We think that the judgment of removal was void and the execution of the order issued thereon properly restrained.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1893: 11894: 11899: 11905: 11922: 11936: 11941: 11944: 11945: 11946: 11950: 11951: 118932026peak 1893 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Larson v. Baker16 N.W.2d 262 (Iowa 1944) · Dissent
  2. Liken v. Shaffer64 F. Supp. 432 (N.D. Iowa 1946)
  3. Southern Minnesota Railway Extension Co. v. St. Paul & S. C. R.55 F. 690 (8th Cir. 1893)
  4. City of Newport v. Commonwealth50 S.W. 845 (Ky. Ct. App. 1899)
  5. Wheatley v. City of Fairfield264 N.W. 906 (Iowa 1936)
  6. Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.20 N.W.2d 457 (Iowa 1945)

Most recent

  1. Davis v. Rudolph45 N.W.2d 886 (Iowa 1951)
  2. Hankin v. Spilker72 A.2d 45 (D.C. 1950)
  3. Liken v. Shaffer64 F. Supp. 432 (N.D. Iowa 1946)
  4. Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.20 N.W.2d 457 (Iowa 1945)
  5. Larson v. Baker16 N.W.2d 262 (Iowa 1944) · Dissent
  6. Kallem v. Kallem295 N.W. 826 (Iowa 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list