State v. Krewsen
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Adams, Ch. J.
1. CRIMINAL burden*!1 pr00f' The defendant introduced evidence tending to prove an alibi. The court gave an instruction in these W01 ■ “ The burden of establishing an alibi is' cast upon the defendant, and the evidence introduced to sustain it should outweigh the proof introduced by the State tending to show that the defendant participated in the burglary. But he is not bound to establish such defense beyond a reasonable doubt, and if upon the whole case, the testimony raises in your minds a reasonable doubt that the defendant was at the place of the burglary, and you find that said offense was not committed by the counsel, advice, or direction of the defendant, then you should find the defendant not guilty.”
The defendant objects to so much of the instruction as charges the jury that the evidence of the alibi should outweigh the evidence tending to show that the defendant participated in the burglary.
Under the rule adopted by a majority of the court in State *589 v. Hamilton, post, p. 596, decided at the present term, the instruction must be approved.
We discover no error upon any other point, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.