TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mears v. United States

Richard Dean Mears v. United States of America United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons John Hahn, Warden Calvin Weaver, Camp Administrator Robert Flynn, Counselor, Defendants

Mears v. United States, 85 F.3d 616 (4th Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 29, 1996
Docket
No. 95-8525
Citations
85 F.3d 6161996 WL 2341571996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31954
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

85 F.3d 616

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Richard Dean MEARS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; John Hahn, Warden; Calvin Weaver, Camp Administrator; Robert Flynn, Counselor, Defendants- Appellees.

No. 95-8525.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 21, 1996. Decided: April 29, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1561-A)

Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mears v. United States, No. CA-95-1561-A (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list