Heminger v. Robb
Heminger v. Robb, 13 N.W. 426 (Iowa 1882)
Headnotes
Evidence conflicting: judgment affirmed.
Summary
Appeal from Van Burén District Court.
Action upon a promissory note. The defendant admitted the execution of the note, and pleaded a counter-claim. There was a trial without a jury, and j udgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount of the note. The defendant appeals.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Adams, J.
The defendant claims that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. But the evidence is not without conflict. It is voluminous and complicated, and it may be that the court erred in the conclusion reached; but such error, if any, it is beyond our power to correct, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.