Goodnow v. Plumb
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Beck, On. J.-
I. This case involves the same qxiestions of law arising upon like facts which are decided in the second, sixth and seventh points of the opinion in Goodnow v. Wells, ante, p. 654, decided at the present term. It is unnecessary to discuss these questions again, or to notice them further then to announce that in their disposition we follow our ruling in that case.
II. The venue of the cause was changed upon motion of plaintiff, which is now complained of by defendant as erroneous, for the reason that an affidavit upon which it was made *662 was insufficient. But tbe abstract before us does not show that the order making the change of venue was excepted to in the court below. It therefore cannot be made a ground of objection in this court.
No other questions are presented in the argument of counsel. The judgment of the district court must be
Affirmed
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.