Dixon v. Rockwell, Sac & Dacota Railway Co.
Dixon v. The Rockwell, Sac & Dacota Railway Company
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Seevers, C. J.
— The defendant sought to condemn a right of way over certain real estate, and for this purpose caused a notice to be served on the plaintiff as owner, and Palmer & Searight and John T. Searight, trustees, for certain parties holding mortgages on the real estate, of its application to the sheriff to cause commissioners to be appointed to assess the damages. The commissioners made a joint assessment of damages to the parties above named. The plaintiff appealed from such assessment by serving notice of appeal on the sheriff and defendant. The latter filed a motion to *368 dismiss the appeal, because the trustees of the mortgagees did not join in the appeal; and thereupon'the-plaintiff asked leave to bring in and make said trustees-parties to the appeal in case they refused to join therein. The motion of the defendant to dismiss the appeal was. overruled, and the motion of the plaintiff sustained. Thereupon there was a trial and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. The only question we are required to' determine is whether the court erred in refusing to dismiss the appeal. The case is in all respects like Lance v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 57 Iowa, 636 ; and counsel asks us to overrule that case. This we are not prepared to do, but, following it, the judgment of the district court must be
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.