TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dewitt v. Mills County

C. H. Dewitt v. Mills County

Dewitt v. Mills Cnty., 101 N.W. 766 (Iowa 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 17, 1904
Judges
Ladd
Citations
101 N.W. 766126 Iowa 169
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Contagious disease; employment of physician. A board of health of a special charter city may, in an emergency, legally contract with a member of the city council and also the, health officer of the city to attend persons who are a county charge afflicted with a contagious disease.
Summary
■Appeal from Mills District Court.— HoN. W. K. Green, Judge. ActioN to recover for medical services rendered under a contract with the board of health of Glenwood. A directed verdict was returned, upon which judgment was entered as prayed. The defendant appeals.—

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ladd

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ladd, J.—

In December, 1901, an epidemic of small" pox broke out in the city of Glenwood, and the plaintiff was *170 employed to render all necessary medical services to those afflicted with the disease on the following terms: Por the first case he was to receive $150; for the next three, $100 each; and thereafter $50 for each patient. Pour patients were treated. Payment has been made for the first. The other fhree were persons for whose care the county was liable. Some question is raised concerning the liability of two of these, but the evidence showed conclusively that they were without means.' That part of the answer alleging that at the time of entering into the contract the plaintiff was 'a member of the city council of Glenwood, and also health officer of its board of health, was stricken, on motion, as being immaterial and irrelevant. The ruling was correct. Glenwood is a city under special charter, and the board of health consisted of five members designated by the mayor. The plaintiff was not one of these, and there is nothing in the statutes prohibiting him, in an emergency, from being employed by the board of health at an agreed compensation. Section 1026, Code. This was not subject to the approval of the council, and the contract was not invalidated by section 943 of the Code, prohibiting any member of the council from becoming a' interested directly or indirectly in any contract for work or service to be performed for the corporation.” The corporation referred to is the city, and, as the service was not to be rendered for it, but at the expense of the county, the statute does not apply.— Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 11910: 119052026peak 1905 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Young v. City of Mankato105 N.W. 969 (Minn. 1905)
  2. Bjelland v. City of Mankato127 N.W. 397 (Minn. 1910)

Most recent

  1. Bjelland v. City of Mankato127 N.W. 397 (Minn. 1910)
  2. Young v. City of Mankato105 N.W. 969 (Minn. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list