TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frederick v. Davis

H. J. Frederick v. R. L. Davis and Millie C. Davis

Frederick v. Davis, 110 N.W. 611 (Iowa 1907)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 14, 1907
Judges
Ierwin
Citations
110 N.W. 611133 Iowa 362
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Vendor and vendee: rescission. A vendor in a contract for the sale of real estate containing no forfeiture clause, who rescinds because of failure to make payments as agreed, must return the payments already made.
Summary
Appeal from Jefferson District Court.— IIon M. A. Eoberts, Judge. Suit to recover back money paid on the purchase price of land. Trial to the court, and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.—

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ierwin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Si-ierwin, J.—

The plaintiff and the defendants entered into an oral contract for purchase and sale of certain land at the agreed price of $3,300. The plaintiff paid $300 in cash, but afterwards failed to make further payment, as he had agreed, and thereupon the defendants rescinded the contract, returned to the plaintiff the notes which he had given them for a part of the price, and refused to return the money paid. It is the rule in this State that a party may not rescind a partly executed contract without placing the other party in statu quo. And the rule is applicable to the sale of real estate when there is no forfeiture clause in the contract. Anderson v. Haskell, 45 Iowa, 47 ; Burge v. Railroad Co., 32 Iowa, 101 ; Downey v. Riggs, 102 Iowa, 92 ; Myers v. Townsend, 103 Iowa, 572 . The appellants rely on Downey v. Riggs as an authority for their claim that *363 the plaintiff herein cannot recover. But in that ease the plaintiff was not only at fault, but, according to the allegations of the answer, himself rescinded the contract. The case came to us on a ruling sustaining a demurrer to the answer, and we held the answer good. In the instant case the defendants rescinded because of the fault of the plaintiff, and, having done so, he must return the money received.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11913: 11914: 11929: 11931: 11936: 11948: 11949: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Holman v. Wahner268 N.W. 168 (Iowa 1936)
  2. Westercamp v. Smith31 N.W.2d 347 (Iowa 1948)
  3. Lake v. Bernstein246 N.W. 790 (Iowa 1931)
  4. Lutz v. Cunningham38 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa 1949)
  5. Waters v. Pearson144 N.W. 1026 (Iowa 1914)
  6. Tague v. McColm123 N.W. 960 (Iowa 1909)

Most recent

  1. Lutz v. Cunningham38 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa 1949)
  2. Westercamp v. Smith31 N.W.2d 347 (Iowa 1948)
  3. Holman v. Wahner268 N.W. 168 (Iowa 1936)
  4. Lake v. Bernstein246 N.W. 790 (Iowa 1931)
  5. Hawkins v. Mullen223 N.W. 670 (Neb. 1929)
  6. Waters v. Pearson144 N.W. 1026 (Iowa 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Downey v. Riggs, 70 N.W. 1091 (Iowa 1897) 28
Burge v. Cedar Rapids & Mo. R. R., 32 Iowa 101 (1871) 18
Anderson v. Haskell, 45 Iowa 45 (1876) 10
Myers v. Townsend, 72 N.W. 761 (Iowa 1897) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list