TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Local 94 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY v. LOCAL 94 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS

Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co. v. Local 94 Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 27 F. App'x 127 (3d Cir. 2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 31, 2002
Docket
No. 01-2147
Citations
27 F. App'x 127

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

The facts and procedural background of this case are familiar to the parties. Pursuant to its statutory authority under 42 U.S.C. § 2201 (i), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has adopted regulations to ensure that individuals with unescorted ac *128 cess to protected areas of a nuclear power plant are sufficiently trustworthy and do not pose an unreasonable risk to public health and safety, including “the potential to commit radiological sabotage.” 10 C.F.R. § 73.56 (2000). To screen individuals, nuclear power plant licensees must have in place an access authorization program as part of the facility’s physical security plan, and this plan must be approved by the Commission. See id.

We hold that the District Court below properly granted Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and properly denied Appellant’s cross-motions for summary judgment. In his 39 page Opinion accompanying the Order, dated April 6, 2001, the Magistrate Judge correctly held that issues of site access for employees are not subject to arbitration under the grievance and arbitration provisions of the current collective bargaining agreement between the employer, PSE & G, and the union, Local 94. We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find no ground to reverse.

The Order of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2012: 22013: 120122026peak 2012 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list