United States v. Gray
United States v. David Furtado GRAY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
David Furtado Gray appeals the district court’s orders denying various motions filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Significantly, we note Gray’s motions appear to rest upon an incorrect premise, inasmuch as this Court in fact considered the order he contends was omitted from his original appeal in this matter. See United States v. Gray, No. 01-6323, 2001 WL 574717 , 10 Fed.Appx. 180 (4th Cir. May 29, 2001) (unpublished), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 568 , 151 L.Ed.2d 441 (2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Gray, Nos. CR-95-3640-AMD; CA-99-575-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 17 & 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.