TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Basham v. Commonwealth

Basham v. Commonwealth, 9 S.W. 284 (Ky. Ct. App. 1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 29, 1888
Judges
Bennett
Citations
9 S.W. 28487 Ky. 4401888 Ky. LEXIS 90
Headnotes
Criminal Law — Evidence.—It is competent for the Commonwealth to prove that the defendant, after he was accused of the crime with which he is charged, fled or concealed himself, or was guilty of any other conduct inconsistent with his innocence. It was, therefore, competent in this case to prove that, after the defendant was put in jail by the order of the examing court, he conducted himself in such a way as indicated that he was feigning insanity.
Summary
Case 67 — INDICTMENT APPEAL FROM BRECKINRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT. Record and briefs not accessible.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bennett

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

JUDGE BENNETT

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant having been convicted in the Breckinridge Circuit Court of the crime of rape, committed on his niece, a girl of sixteen years of age, and the court having overruled Ms motion for a new trial, lie has appealed to this court.

The girl swore positively that the appellant raped lier. The appellant swore that he did not touch her.

The Commonwealth’s attorney was permitted, over the objection of the appellant, to prove by the jailer of Breckinridge county, that shortly after the appellant was pnt in jail by the order of the examining court, he was guilty of such conduct as indicated that he was feigning insanity. The appellant now complains of the ruling of the court in reference to that matter.

It is competent for the Commonwealth to prove that. *441 the accused, after committing the act or having been accused of it, fled or concealed himself, or was guilty of any other conduct inconsistent with his innocence. If the appellant did feign insanity, the jury had a right to infer from that fact that he, having'no meritorious defense, purposed to fix up a spurious defense as the only available one against the truth of the charge ; and such conduct being inconsistent with innocence, it was proper for the jury to consider it for what it was worth.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11919: 11924: 11926: 11943: 21955: 119102026peak 1943 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Commonwealth v. Howard287 S.W.2d 926 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955)
  2. Waller v. United States179 F. 810 (8th Cir. 1910)
  3. State v. Lyles175 S.W.2d 587 (Mo. 1943)
  4. Commonwealth v. Sheppard48 N.E.2d 630 (Mass. 1943)
  5. Garman v. Commonwealth209 S.W. 528 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919)
  6. Anderson v. Commonwealth262 S.W. 1105 (Ky. Ct. App. 1924)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Howard287 S.W.2d 926 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955)
  2. State v. Lyles175 S.W.2d 587 (Mo. 1943)
  3. Commonwealth v. Sheppard48 N.E.2d 630 (Mass. 1943)
  4. Forgey v. Commonwealth286 S.W. 1051 (Ky. Ct. App. 1926)
  5. Anderson v. Commonwealth262 S.W. 1105 (Ky. Ct. App. 1924)
  6. Garman v. Commonwealth209 S.W. 528 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list