TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Willard v. Commonwealth

Willard v. Commonwealth, 28 S.W. 151 (Ky. Ct. App. 1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 17, 1894
Judges
Hazelrigg
Citations
28 S.W. 15196 Ky. 1481894 Ky. LEXIS 105
Headnotes
Failure of Legislature to Obey Mandate of Constitution. — Until the Legislature obeys the mandate of Section 252 of the Constitution requiring the establishment of a house of reform or correction for the detention of offenders under the age of eighteen years, it is proper to adjudge the confinement of such offenders in the State penitentiary. The courts have no power to compel the Legislature to act, or to afford relief if it does not act.
Summary
Case 26 —INDICTMENT— APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT. The provision of the Constitution as to the establishment by the Legislature, as soon as practicable, of a House of Reform being mandatory, and the Legislature having for three years failed to provide same, there can be no constitutional punishment by confinement in the penitentiary of offenders under eighteen years of age. (New Constitution, sec. 252.) Though the court may share the dissatisfaction of the appellant with the failure of the Legislature to carry into effect the provisions of sec. 252 of the Constitution, it is powerless to afford the relief sought, as the Legislature itself is the judge of the question when it is practicable to put the provision into effect.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hazelrigg

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

JUDGE HAZELRIGG

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant, a lad of sixteen years, was tried and convicted of the crime of breaking into a store-house with intent to steal, and was sentenced to the State penitentiary for one year.

The' bill of exceptions recites that the trial was regular and free from errors, and the evidence justified the finding; and this is conceded by counsel. But because the culprit is only sixteen years of age, and the Constitution (section 252) provides that the Gren *149 eral Assembly, as soon as practicable, shall provide “for the establishment and maintenance of an institution or institutions for the detention, correction, instruction and reformation of all persons under the age of eighteen years convicted of such felonies and misdemeanors, as may be designated by law; ’ ’ that, therefore, no incarceration in the penitentiary can be constitutionally adjudged against those falling within the class of offenders named.

The legislative department of the government, however, has failed to provide this “House of Reform,” as it was to be styled, and, however much we deplore this failure, there is no power vested under the Constitution in the judiciary department to act, or to afford relief if it does not act. If this appeal has been prosecuted to obtain from this court an indorsement of the legislation required. by section. 252, we unhesitatingly express the belief that the want of some such reformatory institution has long been a crying evil in our State.

We are powerless, however, on this appeal to revise the action of the legislative department, and can reverse only for errors appearing in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1898: 11914: 21918: 11921: 118982026peak 1914 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reed v. Hendrix's201 S.W. 482 (Ky. Ct. App. 1918)
  2. Wells v. Lewis228 S.W. 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1921)
  3. Boone v. Boone169 S.W. 779 (Ark. 1914)
  4. Holliday v. Holliday171 S.W. 156 (Ky. Ct. App. 1914)
  5. Ex Parte Mathews44 S.W. 153 (Tex. Crim. App. 1898)

Most recent

  1. Wells v. Lewis228 S.W. 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1921)
  2. Reed v. Hendrix's201 S.W. 482 (Ky. Ct. App. 1918)
  3. Holliday v. Holliday171 S.W. 156 (Ky. Ct. App. 1914)
  4. Boone v. Boone169 S.W. 779 (Ark. 1914)
  5. Ex Parte Mathews44 S.W. 153 (Tex. Crim. App. 1898)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list