TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nelson County v. City of Bardstown

Nelson Cnty. v. City of Bardstown, 123 Ky. 836 (1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 15, 1906
Judges
Hobson
Citations
123 Ky. 836
Headnotes
1. Appeal — Dismissal—Damages—Damages will be awarded on a supersedeas, where the appeal is dismissed for .want of jurisdiction and the judgment was for the payment of money. 2. Same — Failure to award o damages on a supersedeas, where the appeal was dismissed, was only a clerical error, and'may be corrected on motion, although the time for filing the petition for rehearing has expired. 3. Same — Where a county or other municipality supersedes a judgment, and appeals, damages will be ¡awarded on dismissal for want of jurisdiction, though it might be impracticable to collect the judgment. For former judgment see 121 Ky.
Summary
Case 113. — MOTION BY ¡PLAINTIFF FOR DAMAGES ON A SUPERSEDEAS BOND — MOTION MADE IN APPELLATE COURT. — Motion Sustained.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hobson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion by Chief Justice Hobson

Sustaining.

On September 27,1906, this appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and on November 27th a motion was entered for damages on the supersedeas.

Damages will be awarded on a supersedeas, where the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Accident Company v. Slaughter, 101 Ky. 269 , 19 Ky. Law Rep., 418 , 40 S. W. 675 . The failure to award damages when the appeal was dismissed was only a clerical error, and may be corrected on motion, as any other clerical error, although the time for filing the petition for rehearing has expired.

Where a county or other municipality supersedes a judgment, and appeals, damages will be awarded as against any other litigant, although it might be impracticable to collect the judgment on execution *837 against the county. The right to damages depends upon the character of the judgment superseded, and, the judgment in this ease being for the payment of money, damages may be awarded.

Motion sustained.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11912: 11928: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. Marshall10 S.W.2d 485 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. Commonwealth136 S.W. 222 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911)
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtiss145 S.W. 377 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912)

Most recent

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. Marshall10 S.W.2d 485 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtiss145 S.W. 377 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912)
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Commonwealth136 S.W. 222 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Am. Accident Co. v. Slaughter, 40 S.W. 675 (Ky. Ct. App. 1897) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list