TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bowling Green Gas Light Co. v. Dean

Bowling Green Gas Light Co. v. Dean, Exor.

Bowling Green Gas Light Co. v. Dean, 132 S.W. 1035 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 6, 1911
Judges
Hobson
Citations
132 S.W. 1035141 Ky. 4731911 Ky. LEXIS 11
Headnotes
Error in Copying Record Supplied. — The deposition of Agee having been by mistake omitted by the clerk in copying the record, ■a .supplemental record containing the deposition may to filed. The hill of exceptions showing the deposition was read on the trial; it may be considered though not incorporated in the hill. In that ■case the previous cases on the question are reviewed. The court adheres to the rule laid down. Motion sustained.
Summary
Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hobson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice Hobson — •

On motion to file supplemental record.

.The deposition ..of Agee .having been by mistake omitted by the clerk in copying the record, a supple *474 mental record containing tlie deposition may be filed. Bush v. Lisle, 86 Ky., 505 .

The bill of exceptions showing the deposition was read on the trial, it may be considered though not incorporated in .the hill. (Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Louisville Cotton Oil Co., 136 Ky., 843 .) In that case the previous cases on the question are reviewed. The court adheres to the rule laid down.

Motion sustained.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1919: 119192026peak 1919 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robertson v. Robertson's Admr.214 S.W. 972 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919)

Most recent

  1. Robertson v. Robertson's Admr.214 S.W. 972 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Postal Telg. Cable Co. v. Louisville Cotton Oil Co., 122 S.W. 852 (Ky. Ct. App. 1909) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list