Louisville & Atlantic Railroad v. Phillips
Louisville & Atlantic Railroad Company v. Phillips, Administrator
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice Hobson—
Sustaining Motion.
No form of bill of exception is required. (Civil Code, section 335.) A copy of the stenographer’s transcript approved by the court and filed for the purposes of an appeal by an order of court will be treated as a bill of exceptions when it contains all that is necessary in a bill of exceptions and it was intended as bill of except tions when filed by the circuit court. (Postal Telegraph Co. v. Louisville Cotton Oil Co., 137 Ky., 843 .)
The motion to file the additional record is sustained.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.