Braswell v. Hurley
Braswell v. Hurley, County School Supt.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice Hobson
Affirming,
*206 This appeal is prosecuted on an incomplete transcript of the record. By rule 27 of the court, a partial transcript may be brought up on a schedule filed in the Clerk’s office as prescribed by section 737 of the Code of practice. But no schedule was filed in this case and the clerk merely certifies that the transcript contains a true copy of the petition, the demurrer thereto and the order sustaining it. The presumption is that the circuit court ruled correctly. We cannot know from this transcript what other orders the circuit court made in the action or what other pleadings were filed in it. The presumption that the circuit court ruled correctly is not overcome when a partial transcript is filed, unless it is so made out that under the rule it must be treated as a complete transcript. See Civil Code, section 737, subsection 12.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.