TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Rankin

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company v. Rankin

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Tex. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Rankin, 157 S.W. 926 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 20, 1913
Judges
Clay
Citations
157 S.W. 926154 Ky. 5491913 Ky. LEXIS 104
Headnotes
Carriers — Shipment of Livestock — Injury to Stock — Action for — Measure of Damages. — Ordinarily the measure of damages where stock is injured in shipment is the difference between their market yalue just before and after the injury. This rule, however, contemplates that the injured stock shall be delivered to the plaintiff.
Summary
Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Clay

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion op the Court by William Rogers Clay, Commissioner —

Extending Former Opinion and Overruling Petition for Rehearing.

In our former opinion, which may be found in 153 Ky., 730 , we used the following language:

“Should it turn out that the agreement limiting defendant’s liability to $75 per head was obtained by fraud or deceit, then the ordinary measure of damage will apply, with the exception that the court must take into consideration the fact that the defendant is liable for the proceeds of the sale of the injured stock retained by it, less the expense of sale and' the reasonable cost of the keep of the stock from the time of their injury.”

For the purpose of making clear what is intended by the foregoing language, we deem it necessary to say that ordinarily the measure of damages where stock is injured is the difference between their marked value just before and after injury. This rule, however, contemplates that the injured stock shall be delivered to the plaintiff. To apply that rule without qualification to .the facts of. this case would work an injustice to the *550 plaintiff," for the defendant, after a tender of the stock and a refusal on the part of the plaintiff to receive them, sold the stock and retained the proceeds of the sale' In. this' case, therefore, plaintiff, under the circumstances' indicated, is entitled to recover the difference between the market value of the stock just before and after the injury, and in- addition thereto the proceeds of the sale of the injured stock less the expense of sale and the .reasonable cost of their keep from the time of their injury.

The opinion is extended in the manner indicated, and the petition for rehearing is overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1917: 11918: 11939: 119172026peak 1917 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. Wryn1918 OK 406, 174 P. 280
  2. Knight v. Pennsylvania R. R.132 S.W.2d 950 (Ky. Ct. App. 1939)
  3. Barker v. Crum198 S.W. 211 (Ky. Ct. App. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Knight v. Pennsylvania R. R.132 S.W.2d 950 (Ky. Ct. App. 1939)
  2. Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. Wryn1918 OK 406, 174 P. 280
  3. Barker v. Crum198 S.W. 211 (Ky. Ct. App. 1917)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Tex. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Rankin, 156 S.W. 400 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list