TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Joan E. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Commission Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp Donald Crump, Case Manager

Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons United States Parole Comm'n Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp Donald Crump, Case Manager, 91 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 1996
Docket
No. 96-6280
Citations
91 F.3d 1311996 WL 4267161996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35104
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

91 F.3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joan E. MARCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS; United States Parole Commission; Vic Loy, Warden Alderson Camp; Donald Crump, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1996. Decided: July 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-94-271-1)

Joan E. Marcott, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, WV, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marcott v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-94-271-1 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list