TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Michael T. Watkins v. Margaret Moore, Director, District of Columbia Department of Corrections Dick Trodden, Supervisor, Commonwealth Attorney J.J. Conahan, Arlington Police

Watkins v. Moore, 92 F.3d 1184 (4th Cir. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 6, 1996
Docket
No. 19-2013
Citations
92 F.3d 11841996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25819
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

92 F.3d 1184

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael T. WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret MOORE, Director, District of Columbia Department of Corrections; Dick Trodden, Supervisor, Commonwealth Attorney; J.J. Conahan, Arlington Police, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6784.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1996. Decided: August 6, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-971)

Michael T. Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's memorandum order directing Appellant to particularize his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) 8,958

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list