State ex rel. Grenier v. Couvillon
STATE ex rel. GRENIER v. COUVILLON, Judge
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PROVOSTY, J.
Section 2 of rule 12 of this court ( 21 South, xi ) provides as follows-.
“The court will entertain no application for writs of prohibition, mandamus and the like, unless previous notice of intention to make such application shall have been given to the presiding judge of the lower court and to the opposite party or his counsel; the service of such notice to be made to appear by affidavit.”
Exception is made by the parties in interest that this rule has not been complied with, and, since an inspection of the record shows this exception to be well founded, the application is denied, at the cost of the relators.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.