TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Board of Assessors

LIVERPOOL & LONDON & GLOBE INS. CO. v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Bd. of Assessors, 47 So. 415 (La. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 22, 1908
Docket
No. 16,690
Judges
Breaux, Monroe, Sty
Citations
47 So. 415122 La. 981908 La. LEXIS 413
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
1. Taxation — Situs iron Taxation — Debts Due Nonbesidents. Gen. Electric Company v. Board of Assessors (recently decided) 46 South. 122, reaffirmed. 2. Same — Reduction oe Assessment. A reduction of assessment cannot be decreed in a suit which is distinctly and exclusively for cancellation. Breaux, C. J., and Monroe, J., dissenting. (Syllabus by tha Court.)
Summary
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Thomas C. W. Ellis, Judge. Action by the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company against the board of assessors and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sty

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PROVO STY, J.

The plaintiff company is an English corporation, domiciled in Liverpool, England. It does an insurance business in the state through a local. agent. It has brought this suit to set aside and cancel its assessment for the year 1906. The record leaves it uncertain what the assessment was. of. In the petition it is stated to have been of “money loaned on interest and all bills receivable for money loaned on interest or advanced or for goods sold.” In the written opinion of the learned judge a quo it is stated as in the petition, with the addition, however, of the following: “And all credits of any and every description.” The assessment itself was not offered in evidence, nor a copy of it, nor any evidence of its contents.

We gather from the testimony that the property intended to be assessed was the amount due plaintiff by its policy holders in this state for premiums upon which a credit of 30 and 60 days had been extended.

Dealing with the case from that standpoint, we are bound to maintain the assessment, for the reason that the said credits are due in this state, and have arisen in the course of the business of the plaintiff company done in this state, and are therefore part and parcel of the said business in this state, and as a consequence are taxable here, as was held in the recent case of General Electric Company v. Board of Assessors, 46 South. 122 . 1 In that case every question discussed in the brief of the learned counsel for plaintiff in the instant case was considered and decided, and to go over the matter again would serve no useful purpose.

The evidence shows the amount of the assessment to be excessive; but, as was very properly held by the learned judge a quo, the suit is distinctly for cancellation, and not for reduction of the assessment.

Judgment affirmed.

BREAUX, O. J., and MONROE, J., dissent.

121 La. 116 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11910: 41912: 11922: 11925: 119092026peak 1910 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lisso & Bro. v. Police Jury53 So. 566 (La. 1910)
  2. Shaw v. Watson92 So. 375 (La. 1922)
  3. Orient Ins. v. Board of Assessors50 So. 778 (La. 1909)
  4. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission103 So. 337 (La. 1925)
  5. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. Fitzpatrick52 So. 118 (La. 1910)
  6. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors59 So. 906 (La. 1912)

Most recent

  1. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission103 So. 337 (La. 1925)
  2. Shaw v. Watson92 So. 375 (La. 1922)
  3. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors59 So. 906 (La. 1912)
  4. Lisso & Bro. v. Police Jury53 So. 566 (La. 1910)
  5. Saint v. Martel53 So. 432 (La. 1910)
  6. Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.53 So. 113 (La. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Bd. of Assessors, 46 So. 122 (La. 1908) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list