TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Hodges v. Joyce

STATE ex rel. HODGES v. JOYCE, Registrar of Voters

State ex rel. Hodges v. Joyce, 54 So. 932 (La. 1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 10, 1911
Docket
No. 18,740
Judges
Land
Citations
54 So. 932128 La. 4341911 La. LEXIS 576
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) Elections (§ 73*) — Qualifications oe Voters — Residence. An actual bona fide residence for the purpose of registration is not lost by temporary absence of the voter while employed in work elsewhere. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Elections, Cent. Dig. §§ 69, 70; Dec. Dig. § 73.*]
Summary
Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia ; John S. Boatner, Judge. Proceeding by rule by the State, on the relation of A. J. Hodges, against John J. Joyce, Registrar of Voters, and another. Judgment for defendants, and relator appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Land

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

LAND, J.

This is a proceeding by rule to have erased from the registration roll of the Ferriday precinct the name of the defendant John J. Cannon, on the ground of the want of proper qualification as to residence.

There was judgment for the defendant, and the relator has appealed. John J. Cannon is a young man who attained his majority on February 20,1911. He has been living in Ferriday several years, but on December 20, 1911, he went to Mississippi to work under a section foreman, who was supervising the repair of railroad tracks. Defendant’s abode in Mississippi has been a box car, stationary only for a day or two.

While in Ferriday, the defendant lived with an elder brother, who was ear inspector. They occupied a stationary box car, which had been partitioned off so as to serve the purposes of a dwelling. The defendant’s father has lived in the same box car for six months or more. While this kind of nn *435 abode is rather unusual, it has served all the purposes of a dwelling, and the contention has been narrowed down to the question whether the defendant, by going to Mississippi has abandoned his residence in Ferriday; and the solution of the question depends on the answer to the inquiry whether the absence of the defendant is temporary ■or permanent in its nature. Defendant frankly testified that be expected to remain in Mississippi as long as be could hold his present job, but would return to his home at Ferriday if he lost his job, or got sick, or could obtain a better job in Louisiana. Defendant left bis trunk and part of bis clothing in Ferriday, which be calls “home.” He has no other abode in this state.

The trial judge found that the defendant had not changed, nor intended to change, his residence, and we cannot say that his finding is manifestly erroneous on the face of the record.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 11918: 11921: 11927: 21941: 119152026peak 1927 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hall v. Godchaux90 So. 145 (La. 1921)
  2. Caufield v. Cravens70 So. 226 (La. 1915)
  3. Melerine v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee114 So. 711 (La. 1927)
  4. Aubert v. Burns77 So. 782 (La. 1918)
  5. Brantley v. Smith6 La. App. 182 (1927)
  6. State ex rel. Carr v. Steele200 So. 496 (La. Ct. App. 1941)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Carr v. Steele200 So. 496 (La. Ct. App. 1941)
  2. Melerine v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee114 So. 711 (La. 1927)
  3. Brantley v. Smith6 La. App. 182 (1927)
  4. Hall v. Godchaux90 So. 145 (La. 1921)
  5. Aubert v. Burns77 So. 782 (La. 1918)
  6. Caufield v. Cravens70 So. 226 (La. 1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list