TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buttner v. Palmisano

Buttner v. Palmisano, 93 So. 880 (La. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 30, 1922
Docket
No. 24615
Judges
Paul, Whole
Citations
93 So. 880152 La. 5871922 La. LEXIS 2379

Opinion of the Court — Paul

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ST. PAUL, J.

Plaintiff alleges: That on September 13, 1919, he purchased from defendant a certain wagon and garden tools for $180, of which he paid $153.50 November 7, 1919, and $27.50 on February 10, 1920. That on February 6, 1920, defendant stopped him on the street, forcibly unhitched petitioner’s horse, and took possession of the wagon, and then struck petitioner when he attempted to interfere. That defendant kept the wagon four days, and until the sum of $27.50 (Which was then due) had been paid; whereby petitioner lost four days work at $5 per day, $80 in trade permanently withdrawn from him, $1,000 for humiliation and loss of the good opinion and esteem of his neighbors, who witnessed the occurrence, and $2,500 for mental anguish and the bodily fear to which he was put by said defendant.

The defense was that the plaintiff consented that defendant should take and hold the wagon until the balance of $27.50 was paid. The trial judge found for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to this court.

I.

Not a line of evidence was introduced to show that any of plaintiff’s neighbors witnessed the occurrence, or that plaintiff lost' any of their good opinion or esteem; and the claim of $2,500 for “mental anguish and bodily fear” is manifestly forced and exaggerated.

Therefore, even if the trial judge erred in finding for defendant (on which we express no opinion), it is clear that plaintiff’s claim is palpably inflated for the sole purpose of giving this court jurisdiction on appeal. For it is inconceivable that plaintiff can be entitled to a judgment even approximating the lower limit of our jurisdiction ($2,000).

II.

In Buck v. Latimer, 151 La. 883 , 92 South. 372 , and Lo Cicero v. Societa Italiana, 151 La. 887 , 92 South. 373 , this court said:

“Where plaintiff’s claim is manifestly inflated for the purpose of giving appellate jurisdiction to this court, the appeal will not be entertained here, but will be transferred to the *589 proper appellate court; and plaintiff will be taxed, with the costs of this court.”

See, also, Wagner v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., 151 La. 400 , 91 South. 817 , and Vitrano v. Levy, 151 La. 890 , 92 South. 374 .

Decree.

It;is therefore ordered that this appeal he transferred to the Court of Appeal, for the parish of Orleans, provided that same be lodged in that court within 15 days after this decree becomes final, plaintiff to pay the costs of this court, and all other costs to abide the final result.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1923: 11940: 11948: 11950: 11951: 11952: 11953: 11956: 11957: 21958: 119232026peak 1957 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Breaux v. Simon104 So. 2d 168 (La. 1958)
  2. Nash v. Curette51 So. 2d 71 (La. 1951)
  3. Jackson v. Perkins59 So. 2d 708 (La. 1952)
  4. Trenchard v. Central Laundry Co.98 So. 558 (La. 1923)
  5. Templet v. Babbitt199 So. 127 (La. 1940)
  6. Harris v. Barron93 So. 2d 663 (La. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Breaux v. Simon104 So. 2d 168 (La. 1958)
  2. Levy v. Andress-Hanna, Inc.94 So. 2d 668 (La. 1957)
  3. Harris v. Barron93 So. 2d 663 (La. 1957)
  4. Des Ormeaux v. Dufour85 So. 2d 518 (La. 1956)
  5. Accardo v. Dimiceli66 So. 2d 348 (La. Ct. App. 1953)
  6. Jackson v. Perkins59 So. 2d 708 (La. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Wagner v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 91 So. 817 (La. 1922) 30
Buck v. Latimer, 92 So. 372 (La. 1922) 9
Lo Cicero v. Societa Italiana Di M. B. Cristoforo Columbo, 92 So. 373 (La. 1922) 8
Vitrano v. Levy, 92 So. 374 (La. 1922) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list