TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Smith

State v. Smith, 95 So. 705 (La. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 26, 1923
Docket
No. 25686
Judges
Paul
Citations
95 So. 705153 La. 2451923 La. LEXIS 1748

Opinion of the Court — Paul

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ST. PAUL, J.

The accused was charged and convicted of having whisky in his possession for sale for beverage purposes.

The record contains no bill of exception, or plea whatever presenting any question of law, and the appeal was frankly taken to have this court “review the evidence” on which the defendant was convicted.

As this court cannot “review the evidence,” and defendant alleges no error of law, the judgment appealed from must stand.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 119262026peak 1926 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Russell108 So. 324 (La. 1926)

Most recent

  1. State v. Russell108 So. 324 (La. 1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list