TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dr. G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets

DR. G. H. TICHENOR ANTISEPTIC COMPANY v. SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS, a Commercial Partnership, John G. Schwegmann, Jr., Paul S. Schwegmann, Anthony Schwegmann, Wilfred J. Meyer, Charles Acquistapace, Ernest Barrios, and O'Neil Barrios

G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, 79 So. 2d 77 (La. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 1, 1955
Docket
No. 41903
Judges
Hawthorne
Citations
79 So. 2d 77227 La. 2331955 La. LEXIS 1234

Opinion of the Court — Hawthorne

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment perpetuating a preliminary writ of injunction against them and restraining them from advertising, offering for sale, or selling Dr. Tichenor’s antiseptic at prices less than the minimum retail prices set by the plaintiff under a certain fair trade contract.

This court is without appellate jurisdiction of this case as the record does not affirmatively show that there is in dispute a sum in excess of $2,000, nor does it fall within any other of the .classes of *236 cases of which this court is given appellate jurisdiction by Article 7, Section 10, of the Constitution. That this court is without appellate jurisdiction is conceded by appellants and appellee, who have filed a joint motion to transfer the case to the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans.

For the reasons assigned this case is ordered transferred to the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans, provided that the record is filed in that court within 30 days from the date on which this decree shall become final; otherwise the appeal will be dismissed. The appellants are to pay the costs of the appeal to the Supreme Court; all other costs are to await the final disposition of the case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1956: 119562026peak 1956 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list