TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Martin v. Williams

Martin v. Williams, 3 La. Ann. 582 (1848)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1848
Judges
Slidell
Citations
3 La. Ann. 582
Headnotes
Where several terms have elapsed since the suggestion of plaintiff's death, and the malting of an order authorizing the revival of the action in the name of her heirs, without any appearance by them or any one authorized to represent the succession, the court will, on motion, order a dismissal to be entered at .the next term, unless art appearance be entere d before that time.
Summary
APPEAL from the District Court of Claiborne, King, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Slidell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The judgment of the court was pronounced by Slidell, J.

The transcript in this cause was filed in 1843. In 1845, the death of the appellant was suggested, and an order made authorizing the suit to be revived in the name of Lucinda Marlin's heirs. Since that period no appearance has been made by her heirs, or any one authorized to represent the succession of Mrs. Martin, or die persons for whom she sued as tutrix in this s.uit; nor, at the calling of the cause, has any counsel for the appellants appeared.

The appellees at the present term, have presented a notice for the dismissal of the appeal. The omission during so long a time to make an appearance and prosecute the appeal, justifies the application of the appellees ; and it is therefore. considered that, unless, at or befoi’e the opening of this court at its next term, due appearance be entered by the lawful representative of the deceased Lucinda Marlin, or by some person duly authorized to prosecute the said appeal, the said appeal will, on the first day of the next Alexandria term, be disnfissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list