United States v. De Varon
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 96-5421 District Court No. 96-576-CR-KMM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ISABEL RODRIGUEZ DE VARON, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida -------------------------- ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion March 3, 1998, 11th Cir., ___F.3rd___)
(May 29, 1998)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing
en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing
en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
______________________ * Senior Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (c).
2
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(rejecting the argument that a defendant cannot be a minor participant in his own conduct)
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.