TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Baltor v. Judge of Fourth District Court

The State ex rel. J. B. Baltor v. Judge of Fourth District Court

State ex rel. Baltor v. Judge of Fourth Dist. Court, 30 La. Ann. 599 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1878
Docket
No. 7127
Judges
Manning
Citations
30 La. Ann. 599
Headnotes
In all appeals to this court the appellant is primarily liable for all the costs occasioned by the appeal, and may be compelled to pay them.
Summary
^PPLICATION for a writ of prohibition.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Manning

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Manning, C. J.

The relator is appellant from a judgment in the Fourth Court against him for over seven hundred dollars and interest, •and having taken his appeal by petition, citations to the appellees became necessary, of whom there are several hundred. The clerk of that court issued these citations with copies of petition, and demanded of the appellant his fees therefor, amounting to two hundred and thirteen dollars and 84 cents, which not being paid, the clerk obtained the •approval of the Judge of the fee bills and proceeded regularly to compel payment by judicial process, whereupon the relator applied to us *600 and obtained a temporary prohibition with an order to shew cause in the usual form.

The clerk and judge answer that the act of April 6,1872 justifies their proceedings, and so it does. In all appeals to this court, the appellant is primarily liable for all the costs occasioned by the appeal, and the-plaintiff, if appellee, can not be called on to pay these costs unless and until he is condemned to pay them by judgment on appeal.

The relator here, appellant there, is liable now for the fees and costs of the appeal, and the Judge rightly condemned him to pay them.

The writ heretofore issued is set aside and the petition herein is dismissed .at the relator’s costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lawrence v. Lawrence134 So. 753 (La. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Lawrence v. Lawrence134 So. 753 (La. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list