TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Stewart

State v. H. H. Stewart

State v. Stewart, 14 So. 306 (La. 1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1894
Docket
No. 11,416
Judges
Breaux
Citations
14 So. 30646 La. Ann. 117
Headnotes
The judge refused to permit the district attorney to move for the forfeiture of the bail bond of the accused on the second day ®f the criminal term, and based his ruling, in thus ruling, upon proof that the accused was prevented from attending court by physical disability. The Attorney General and the district attorney of the district admit that the ruling was correct, and consent to the dismissal of the appeal.
Summary
APPEAL from the Tenth District Oonrt, Parish of Natchitoches. Andrews, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Breaux

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Breaux, J.

The appeal was prosecuted by the district attorney from a ruling of the court a qua refusing to permit him in behalf of the State to forfeit the bail bond of the accused on the second day of the term.

The ruling of the court is sustained by the evidence.

It was proven that the accused was prevented from attending court by physical disability.

Counsel for the accused interposed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal, averring the correctness of the ruling o'f the District Court.

The Attorney General and the district attorney who conducted the prosecution admit that the appeal has no merit, and consent that it be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 11908: 41914: 11928: 11934: 11949: 119052026peak 1908 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list