TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Clark

State of Louisiana v. Arthur Clark

State v. Clark, 22 So. 257 (La. 1897)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 12, 1897
Docket
No. 12,450
Judges
Nicholls
Citations
22 So. 25749 La. Ann. 7801897 La. LEXIS 643
Headnotes
Transcript of appeal filed after the expiration of return day will be dismissed.
Summary
APPEAL from the Ninth Judicial District Court for the Parish of De Soto. Ball, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Nicholls

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Nicholls, C. J.

Defendant, indicted for murder, has appealed from the judgment of the District Court sentencing him to hard labor in the penitentiary for life under a verdict returned against him of “ Guilty without capital punishment.”

The State moved for the dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the transcript was filed too late.

The prisoner was sentenced on February 13, 1897. On his application made the same day he was granted an appeal, returnable to the Supreme Court at New Orleans in ten days. The transcript of appeal was file<J in this court on March 9, 1897. No explanation of or excuse for the delay has been assigned, though defendant was represented by regular counsel. We have no alternative left to us.

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11912: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.52 So. 550 (La. 1910)
  2. State v. Holt57 So. 523 (La. 1912)

Most recent

  1. State v. Holt57 So. 523 (La. 1912)
  2. Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.52 So. 550 (La. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list