Stephenson & Hand v. Shreveport Natatorium & Amusement Co.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DREW, J.
This case was fixed regularly for trial in this court, and appellants have made no appearance. They have neither argued the case nor filed brief. There is no error patent on the face of the record, and appellants have pointed out no error in the judgment appealed from.
The judgment is presumed to be correct, and, in the absence of assistance from appellants, this court will not seek to detect errors therein not patent on the face of the record. Bynum vs. Lieber, 155 La. 760 , 99 So. 590 ; Schwan vs. Peterman, 123 La. 732 , 49 So. 486 ; Arkadelphia Milling Co. vs. Anders et al., 5 La. App. 193 ; Suc. of Suner, 5 La. App. 121 ; Blasdel vs. McElroy, 7 La. App. 109 .
It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.